letsR: a new R package for data handling and analysis in macroecology
Summary
- The current availability of large ecological data sets and the computational capacity to handle them have fostered the testing and development of theory at broad spatial and temporal scales. Macroecology has particularly benefited from this era of big data, but tools are still required to help transforming this data into information and knowledge.
- Here, we present ‘letsR’, a package for the R statistical computing environment, designed to handle and analyse macroecological data such as species’ geographic distributions (polygons in shapefile format and point occurrences) and environmental variables (in raster format). The package also includes functions to obtain data on species’ habitat use, description year and current as well as temporal trends in conservation status as provided by the IUCN RedList online data base.
- ‘letsR’ main functionalities are based on the presence–absence matrices that can be created with the package's functions and from which other functions can be applied to generate, for example species richness rasters, geographic mid‐points of species and species‐ and site‐based attributes.
- We exemplify the package's functionality by describing and evaluating the geographic pattern of species’ description year in tailless amphibians. All data preparation and most analyses were made using the ‘letsR’ functions. Our example illustrates the package's capability for conducting macroecological analyses under a single computer platform, potentially helping researchers to save time and effort in this endeavour.
Introduction
The rise of ‘big data’ is leading to transformations in the way research is conducted in different knowledge areas and ecology is not an exception (Hampton et al. 2013). Such amount and variety of data and the computational capacity to process it have turned ecology into a data‐intensive science (Michener & Jones 2012), enabling theory testing and development at broader spatial and temporal scales and with more resolution than any time before. For instance, the macroecological research programme with its focus on the statistical regularities emerging from studying ecological systems at large scales (Marquet 2009) has particularly benefited from this big data revolution. Indeed, macroecology has steadily grown and become central in ecological research (Beck et al. 2012) contributing answers to unsolved questions in ecology and evolution, some of which were stated centuries ago (Hawkins 2001; Gaston, Chown & Evans 2008).
This current era of big data in ecology also brings big challenges. These challenges are mainly related to the manipulation of large data sets necessary to transform such data into information and knowledge (Schadt et al. 2010; Michener & Jones 2012). Converting large data sets into information and knowledge demands different steps including data gathering, organization, preparation, analysis and presentation (modified from Liew 2007). Moreover, without proper tools, conducting these steps may be exceedingly time‐consuming and easily subject to human errors. Thus, current efforts are being conducted to develop tools that can help in this endeavour (Rangel, Diniz‐Filho & Bini 2010).
In macroecology, typical data involve species’ geographic distributions in polygon format or occurrence records (e.g. spatial data made available by IUCN, BirdLife or GBIF), species traits measurements (e.g. Jones et al. 2009), phylogenetic hypotheses on species’ evolutionary relationships (e.g. Piel et al. 2000) and spatial environmental layers (e.g. Hijmans et al. 2005). Macroecological analyses require these data to be integrated and manageable. A practical way to integrate basic macroecological information is the presence–absence matrix (PAM) (Arita et al. 2008; Gotelli et al. 2009) that summarizes species’ geographic distributions and diversity, the two fundamental units of biogeography (Arita et al. 2008). Conventionally, in a PAM, rows represent species, columns represent sites, and elements record the occurrence of a given species in a given site, either as binary (i.e. presence: 1, or absence: 0) or quantitative data (i.e. abundance or trait values) (Bell 2003; Arita et al. 2008). Such PAMs can be generated from ecological surveys of localities or from overlaying a grid of cells onto the area of study, with the latter method being standard in macroecological analyses (Gotelli et al. 2009). Moreover, further data can be integrated into the PAM as additional rows representing site descriptors such as location (e.g. geographic coordinates), environmental conditions or other descriptors. In this way, a PAM allows species‐ and site‐based analyses either summarizing data solely by species or sites (R‐mode and Q‐mode analyses; Simberloff & Connor 1979) or simultaneously considering information from both species and sites (Rq‐mode and Qr‐mode; Arita et al. 2008).
Here, we present a new R package, ‘letsR’, for obtaining, handling and analysing data for macroecological research. The main functions of this package allow the user to generate a PAM from species’ geographic distributions (polygon and point occurrence data) and merge it with species’ traits and spatial environmental layers. Other package's functions provide tools to summarize and visualize the information contained in a PAM including transformation and direct analyses such as the estimation of distance matrices or spatial autocorrelograms. In addition, the package contains functions to acquire species data from the IUCN Red List online data base such as description year (the year in which a species was described by the species authority), current conservation status and its temporal trend, and habitat use, among others. We exemplified the package's use, functionality and capacity to convert large amounts of data into information and knowledge by analysing the geographic pattern of description year of tailless amphibians.
letsR package
The ‘letsR’ package is written in the R language and its first version was released on CRAN (The Comprehensive R Archive Network) in May 2014 and can be used under R version 2.1 or higher (R Core Team 2015). We are constantly updating the package and encourage interested users to look for the latest package version on GitHub (https://github.com/macroecology/letsR). The functions available in ‘letsR’ depend on other packages: ‘raster’ (Hijmans 2015), ‘XML’ (Lang 2013), ‘geosphere’ (Hijmans 2014), ‘maptools’ (Bivand & Lewin‐Koh 2015), ‘maps’ (Becker et al. 2014), ‘sp’ (Bivand et al. 2008), ‘fields’ (Nychka, Furrer & Sain 2014) and ‘rgdal’ (Bivand, Keitt & Rowlingson 2014). Every function of ‘letsR’ starts with the prefix ‘lets.’ to avoid conflict with other R functions (see Table 1 for the main functions and their descriptions). The package was named after the Theoretical Ecology and Synthesis Lab (LETS; Portuguese acronym) of the Federal University of Goiás for their contribution to the advancement of macroecology in Brazil and world‐wide.
| Type | Function | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Presence–absence functions | lets.presab | Creates a presence–absence matrix of species’ geographic ranges within a grid |
| lets.presab.birds | Creates a presence–absence matrix of species’ geographic ranges within a grid for the BirdLife spatial data | |
| lets.presab.points | Creates a presence–absence matrix based on species’ point occurrences | |
| Spatial functions | lets.addpoly | Adds polygon coverage to a PresenceAbsence object |
| lets.addvar | Adds variables (in raster format) to a PresenceAbsence object | |
| lets.classvar | Calculates the frequency distribution of a variable within a species’ range | |
| lets.correl | Computes correlogram based on Moran's I index | |
| lets.distmat | Computes a geographic distance matrix | |
| lets.field | Creates species’ values based on the species co‐occurrence within focal ranges | |
| lets.gridirizer | Fits a PresenceAbsence object into a grid in shapefile format | |
| lets.maplizer | Creates a matrix summarizing species’ attributes within cells of a PresenceAbsence object | |
| lets.midpoint | Computes species’ geographic range mid‐points | |
| lets.overlap | Computes pairwise species’ geographic overlap | |
| lets.pamcrop | Crops a PresenceAbsence object based on a input shapefile | |
| lets.rangesize | Computes species’ geographic range size | |
| lets.shFilter | Filters species’ shapefiles based on its presence, origin and season | |
| lets.summarizer | Summarizes variable(s) values within species’ ranges based on a presence–absence matrix | |
| Data download | lets.iucn | Downloads species’ information from the IUCN RedList online database |
| lets.iucn.ha | Downloads species’ habitat information from the IUCN Red List online database | |
| lets.iucn.his | Downloads species’ temporal trend in conservation status from the IUCN RedList online database |
PresenceAbsence class
The package basic functions work mainly with a new S3 object class called ‘PresenceAbsence’. The class ‘PresenceAbsence’ is generated by the three ‘letsR’ functions that create a PAM based on a user‐defined grid cell system (see presence–absence function in Table 1). The new object class is a list consisting of three objects: (I) a sites by species matrix indicating the presence (1) or absence (0) of a given species in a given site (note that this PAM arrangement is the transpose version – with sites in the rows and species in the columns – of the conventional one described above) with the first two columns containing the coordinates corresponding to the cells’ centroids; (II) a raster containing species richness values per cell; and (III) a vector with species’ names contained in the matrix. Any of these three internal objects of the ‘PresenceAbsence’ class can be obtained in the standard way for objects of ‘list’ class (i.e. using list‐subsetting operators: ‘[[‘or ‘$’).
The class ‘PresenceAbsence’ is fundamental for other ‘letsR’ functions, mainly because it contains information beyond the PAM itself such as the user‐defined grid cell system, including its resolution, projection, datum and extent as described by the extreme coordinates, as attributes of the raster object (the second object mentioned above). These attributes are indispensable for other analysis and they cannot be stored in a simple PAM. The ‘PresenceAbsence’ class also allows using generic functions such as ‘plot’, ‘summary’ and ‘print’, which facilitate its description and visualization. Nevertheless, the presence–absence functions (Table 1) also include an argument allowing users to choose between getting the PAM as an object of class ‘matrix’ or ‘PresenceAbsence’. Finally, some ‘letsR’ functions allow the user to input customary R objects (e.g. ‘vector’, ‘matrix’, ‘data.frame’).
Memory and time consumption
Generating and manipulating a PAM can consume a large amount of random‐access memory (RAM), mainly when handling data of large spatial extents and high resolution. The specific amount of RAM needed will depend on the grid extent, cell resolution and the number of species in the analysis. For example, to create a PAM for all anuran species of the world (5597) with a 1° grid cell resolution (see the example analysis below), R itself can consume up to 4·7GB of RAM (note that this number can grow exponentially with the increase in cell resolution). In this example, the whole process took around 1 h 30 min on a laptop computer with an Intel Core i7‐4500U @ 1·80 GHz processor and running under Windows 8·1 of 64 bits. To help the user keep track of the analysis relative running time, namely how many runs are left to finish the analysis, some functions include the ‘count’ argument to open a separate window containing the run countdown.
Example: spatial pattern of description year in tailless amphibians (Amphibia: Anura)
To illustrate the utilities of ‘letsR’, we applied some of its functions to examine the geographic pattern of description year of anuran species (Fig. 1; the detailed R code to recreate the example is available in .Rmd and .pdf formats as supporting information). More specifically, we aimed to (i) generate a global map of the description year for the species of the Anura order; (ii) evaluate whether geographically closer species show similar description year; (iii) assess the effect of the species’ geographic range size and the maximum value of human footprint (i.e. population density, land transformation, human access and power infrastructure) within their ranges on their description years. Instead of attempting an exhaustive exploration on this subject, our main goal was to exemplify the package's functionalities applied to a simple macroecological question using a spatially explicit approach that had only been conducted for limited areas (Diniz‐Filho et al. 2005).

-
Class: PresenceAbsence
-
_ _
-
Number of species: 5597
-
Number of cells: 13 594
-
Cells with presence: 13 594
-
Cells without presence: 0
-
Species without presence: 0
-
Species with the largest range: Bufo bufo
-
_ _
-
Grid parameters
-
Resolution: 1, 1 (x, y)
-
Extention: −180, 180, −90, 90 (xmin, xmax, ymin, ymax)
-
Coord. Ref.: +proj=longlat +datum=WGS84
We gathered the description year for the 5597 species in our data set from the IUCN online data base (IUCN 2012) using the function ‘lets.iucn’ (the ‘PresenceAbsence’ object can be used directly as input). We obtained the mean description year of species within each cell by applying the function ‘lets.maplizer’ (although we used the mean, other summary statistics can be applied; e.g. median, standard deviation), which returns either a vector with the cells’ coordinates and the summarized attribute or this vector and a raster containing this information. Then, we used this raster to map the geographic pattern of description year of tailless amphibians (Fig. 1, step 3). Our results indicated that Europe concentrates the oldest described species, whereas tropical regions (mainly the west region of Australia, sub‐Saharan Africa and the northern Andes) contain more recently described anuran species. This pattern can be expected considering that Europe was the cradle of most early naturalists and taxonomists that pioneered the application of Linnaeus’ binomial nomenclature to species classification.
Exploring the geographic pattern of description year from a species‐oriented perspective also provides information on the factors affecting the trend species discovery. Therefore, we obtained the species’ distributional mid‐point (i.e. the geographic range centroid) using the function ‘lets.midpoint’ and generated a geographic distance matrix between species using the function ‘lets.distmat’. This distance matrix and the description year of each species were used to calculate a Moran's I correlogram using the function ‘lets.correl’ for 200 equidistant classes – which can be equiprobable, depending on the user's preference (Fig. 1, step 4). The results of this species‐oriented analysis support the idea that geographically closer species were described in proximate years. Moreover, species that are separated by a distance of 2000 km (or higher) had independent description years.
We also tested whether the species’ description year pattern was determined by range size or human footprint level within species’ ranges. To do so, we calculated the species range size using the function ‘lets.rangesize’, which calculates the number of cells in which each species occurs (this function can also generate other range size metrics such as the polygon area or the summed area of cells). Then, we obtained a global layer of human footprint at a resolution of 30 arc‐second cell size from the NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (WCS & CIESIN 2005). To assign a value of this variable to each species, we first upscaled the variable to a 1° cell size by averaging the values within each cell and then added it to the PAM as an additional column, using the function ‘lets.addvar’. After, we extracted the maximum value of human footprint within each species’ range using the function ‘lets.summarizer’ that transfers the spatial information at the cell level to the species level. Finally, we did a multiple regression with both range size and maximum human footprint within ranges as explanatory variables and species’ description year as the response variable. A Monte Carlo simulation with 999 repetitions was used to test the model's significance. Results of this analysis indicated that both aspects of species’ ranges influence the variation of description year among anuran species, jointly explaining nearly 30% of the variance (p < 0·001).
Conclusion
Here, we have presented the ‘letsR’ package and illustrated its functionality for conducting macroecological analyses under a single computer platform. ‘letsR’ allows handling large data quantities commonly used in macroecology and applying different tools to process and analyse such data. For instance, to our knowledge, this is the first effort showing a global map of species’ description year for an entire order of vertebrates. In addition, this also highlights the package's potential to help researchers in testing macroecological theories. ‘letsR’ is constantly being improved to attend new demands as the field of macroecology continuous to develop.
Acknowledgements
We thank A.S. Melo, L. Sgarbi, S. Varela, J.A.F. Diniz‐Filho, L. Jardim, F. V. Faleiro, M.S. Lima‐Ribeiro, L.C. Terribile, M.A. Rodríguez, R. Dobrovolski and S. Gouveia for useful suggestions on the package's code and theoretical background. We also thank T. Lucas and S. Chamberlain for detailed suggestions that greatly improved our package's code and manuscript clarity. We are grateful to all the people of LETS (Laboratório de Ecologia Teórica e Síntese – UFG) for testing earlier versions of the package. B.V. was supported by a CAPES grant for doctoral studies and F.V. by a CNPq ‘Science without borders’ fellowship.
Data accessibility
Species distribution data are available in polygon format on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species data base (http://goo.gl/UOhD7Q). The global layer of human footprint at a resolution of 30 arc‐second cell size is available from the NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/repository/wildareas/data/hfp_global_geo_grid.zip). The ‘letsR’ package is available on CRAN (http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/letsR/index.html) and on GitHub (https://github.com/macroecology/letsR).
The R scripts to recreate the example analysis, including the function to gather the description year data (available from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, http://www.iucnredlist.org/), are uploaded as supporting information.
References
Citing Literature
Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 65
- María Celeste Scattolini, Andrés Lira‐Noriega, María Marta Cigliano, Species richness, range size, and wing development in South American melanopline grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Acrididae), Ecological Entomology, 10.1111/een.12859, 45, 4, (840-853), (2020).
- João Claudio Sousa Nascimento, Millke Jasmine Arminini Morales, Wendy Yohana Arroyo-Pérez, Juliana José, Mônica Paiva Quast, Vera Nisaka Solferini, Tropical and Subtropical South America: A Study of Community Turnover Across Environmental Gradients, Neotropical Diversification: Patterns and Processes, 10.1007/978-3-030-31167-4_4, (71-83), (2020).
- Javier Nori, Rafael Loyola, Fabricio Villalobos, Priority areas for conservation of and research focused on terrestrial vertebrates, Conservation Biology, 10.1111/cobi.13476, 34, 5, (1281-1291), (2020).
- Flemming T. Dahlke, Sylke Wohlrab, Martin Butzin, Hans-Otto Pörtner, Thermal bottlenecks in the life cycle define climate vulnerability of fish, Science, 10.1126/science.aaz3658, 369, 6499, (65-70), (2020).
- Facundo Alvarez, Pedro Gerhard, Daniel Paiva Silva, Bruno Spacek Godoy, Luciano Fogaça de Assis Montag, Effects of different variable sets on the potential distribution of fish species in the Amazon Basin, Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 10.1111/eff.12552, 29, 4, (764-778), (2020).
- Soledad Ceccarelli, Silvia A. Justi, Jorge E. Rabinovich, José Alexandre F. Diniz Filho, Fabricio Villalobos, Phylogenetic structure of geographical co‐occurrence among New World Triatominae species, vectors of Chagas disease, Journal of Biogeography, 10.1111/jbi.13810, 47, 6, (1218-1231), (2020).
- Davi Mello Cunha Crescente Alves, Anderson Aires Eduardo, Eduardo Vinícius da Silva Oliveira, Fabricio Villalobos, Ricardo Dobrovolski, Taiguã Corrêa Pereira, Adauto de Souza Ribeiro, Juliana Stropp, João Fabrício Mota Rodrigues, José Alexandre F. Diniz‐Filho, Sidney F. Gouveia, Unveiling geographical gradients of species richness from scant occurrence data, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10.1111/geb.13055, 29, 4, (748-759), (2020).
- Jose D. Rivera, Benigno Gómez, Darío A. Navarrete-Gutiérrez, Lorena Ruíz-Montoya, Leonardo Delgado, Mario E. Favila, Mechanisms of diversity maintenance in dung beetle assemblages in a heterogeneous tropical landscape, PeerJ, 10.7717/peerj.9860, 8, (e9860), (2020).
- Bruna E. Bolochio, Julián N. Lescano, Javier Maximiliano Cordier, Rafael Loyola, Javier Nori, A functional perspective for global amphibian conservation, Biological Conservation, 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108572, 245, (108572), (2020).
- Vicente García‐Navas, Benjamin P. Kear, Michael Westerman, The geography of speciation in dasyurid marsupials, Journal of Biogeography, 10.1111/jbi.13852, 47, 9, (2042-2053), (2020).
- Piotr Minias, Radosław Włodarczyk, Avian developmental rates are constrained by latitude and migratoriness – A global analysis, Journal of Biogeography, 10.1111/jbi.13923, 47, 10, (2156-2167), (2020).
- Fabio Albuquerque, Yaiyr Astudillo-Scalia, The role of rarity as a surrogate of marine fish species representation, PeerJ, 10.7717/peerj.8373, 8, (e8373), (2020).
- Renan Maestri, Maico S. Fiedler, Georgy I. Shenbrot, Elena N. Surkova, Sergei G. Medvedev, Irina S. Khokhlova, Boris R. Krasnov, Harrison's rule scales up to entire parasite assemblages but is determined by environmental factors, Journal of Animal Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2656.13344, 0, 0, (2020).
- Susy Echeverría‐Londoño, Tiina Särkinen, Isabel S. Fenton, Andy Purvis, Sandra Knapp, Dynamism and context‐dependency in diversification of the megadiverse plant genus Solanum (Solanaceae), Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 10.1111/jse.12638, 0, 0, (2020).
- Rodrigo Cámara-Leret, David G. Frodin, Frits Adema, Christiane Anderson, Marc S. Appelhans, George Argent, Susana Arias Guerrero, Peter Ashton, William J. Baker, Anders S. Barfod, David Barrington, Renata Borosova, Gemma L. C. Bramley, Marie Briggs, Sven Buerki, Daniel Cahen, Martin W. Callmander, Martin Cheek, Cheng-Wei Chen, Barry J. Conn, Mark J. E. Coode, Iain Darbyshire, Sally Dawson, John Dransfield, Clare Drinkell, Brigitta Duyfjes, Atsushi Ebihara, Zacky Ezedin, Long-Fei Fu, Osia Gideon, Deden Girmansyah, Rafaël Govaerts, Helen Fortune-Hopkins, Gustavo Hassemer, Alistair Hay, Charlie D. Heatubun, D. J. Nicholas Hind, Peter Hoch, Peter Homot, Peter Hovenkamp, Mark Hughes, Matthew Jebb, Laura Jennings, Tiberius Jimbo, Michael Kessler, Ruth Kiew, Sandra Knapp, Penniel Lamei, Marcus Lehnert, Gwilym P. Lewis, Hans Peter Linder, Stuart Lindsay, Yee Wen Low, Eve Lucas, Jeffrey P. Mancera, Alexandre K. Monro, Alison Moore, David J. Middleton, Hidetoshi Nagamasu, Mark F. Newman, Eimear Nic Lughadha, Pablo H. A. Melo, Daniel J. Ohlsen, Caroline M. Pannell, Barbara Parris, Laura Pearce, Darin S. Penneys, Leon R. Perrie, Peter Petoe, Axel Dalberg Poulsen, Ghillean T. Prance, J. Peter Quakenbush, Niels Raes, Michele Rodda, Zachary S. Rogers, André Schuiteman, Pedro Schwartsburd, Robert W. Scotland, Mark P. Simmons, David A. Simpson, Peter Stevens, Michael Sundue, Weston Testo, Anna Trias-Blasi, Ian Turner, Timothy Utteridge, Lesley Walsingham, Bruce L. Webber, Ran Wei, George D. Weiblen, Maximilian Weigend, Peter Weston, Willem de Wilde, Peter Wilkie, Christine M. Wilmot-Dear, Hannah P. Wilson, John R. I. Wood, Li-Bing Zhang, Peter C. van Welzen, New Guinea has the world’s richest island flora, Nature, 10.1038/s41586-020-2549-5, (2020).
- Yaiyr Astudillo-Scalia, Fábio Albuquerque, Why should we reconsider using species richness in spatial conservation prioritization?, Biodiversity and Conservation, 10.1007/s10531-020-01960-4, (2020).
- Luiz H. Varzinczak, Thais B. Zanata, Mauricio O. Moura, Fernando C. Passos, Geographical patterns and current and short‐term historical correlates of phylogenetic diversity and endemism for New World primates, Journal of Biogeography, 10.1111/jbi.13767, 47, 4, (890-902), (2019).
- Alexander Skeels, Damien Esquerré, Marcel Cardillo, Alternative pathways to diversity across ecologically distinct lizard radiations, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10.1111/geb.13044, 29, 3, (454-469), (2019).
- Miguel Á. Olalla‐Tárraga, Talita Ferreira Amado, Luis Mauricio Bini, Pablo A. Martínez, Ignacio Morales‐Castilla, Erik Joaquin Torres‐Romero, Fabricio Villalobos, Biological traits, phylogeny and human footprint signatures on the geographical range size of passerines (Order Passeriformes) worldwide, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10.1111/geb.12924, 28, 8, (1183-1194), (2019).
- Robert S. C. Cooke, Amanda E. Bates, Felix Eigenbrod, Global trade‐offs of functional redundancy and functional dispersion for birds and mammals, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10.1111/geb.12869, 28, 4, (484-495), (2019).
- Bader H. Alhajeri, Yoan Fourcade, High correlation between species‐level environmental data estimates extracted from IUCN expert range maps and from GBIF occurrence data, Journal of Biogeography, 10.1111/jbi.13619, 46, 7, (1329-1341), (2019).
- María Leo, Juan A. Calleja, Francisco Lara, Ricardo Garilleti, Nagore G. Medina, Drivers of plant richness patterns of Mediterranean riparian forests at local and regional scales have bottom‐up and top‐down effects, Journal of Vegetation Science, 10.1111/jvs.12728, 30, 3, (485-497), (2019).
- Tiago S. Vasconcelos, Fernando R. da Silva, Tiago G. dos Santos, Vitor H. M. Prado, Diogo B. Provete, Tiago S. Vasconcelos, Fernando R. da Silva, Tiago G. dos Santos, Vitor H. M. Prado, Diogo B. Provete, An Introduction to the Biogeography of South American Anurans, Biogeographic Patterns of South American Anurans, 10.1007/978-3-030-26296-9, (1-8), (2019).
- Carmen Galán-Acedo, Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez, Ellen Andresen, Luis Verde Arregoitia, Ernesto Vega, Carlos A. Peres, Robert M. Ewers, The conservation value of human-modified landscapes for the world’s primates, Nature Communications, 10.1038/s41467-018-08139-0, 10, 1, (2019).
- Nadia Bystriakova, Pablo Hendrigo Alves De Melo, Justin Moat, Eimear Nic Lughadha, Alexandre K. Monro, A Preliminary Evaluation of The Karst Flora of Brazil Using Collections Data, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/s41598-019-53104-6, 9, 1, (2019).
- Joshua R. Ennen, Mickey Agha, Sarah C. Sweat, Wilfredo A. Matamoros, Jeffrey E. Lovich, Anders G.J. Rhodin, John B. Iverson, Christopher W. Hoagstrom, Turtle biogeography: Global regionalization and conservation priorities, Biological Conservation, 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108323, (108323), (2019).
- Jorge S. Gutiérrez, Theunis Piersma, David W. Thieltges, Micro‐ and macroparasite species richness in birds: The role of host life history and ecology, Journal of Animal Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2656.12998, 88, 8, (1226-1239), (2019).
- Lauriane M. Baraf, Morgan S. Pratchett, Peter F. Cowman, Ancestral biogeography and ecology of marine angelfishes (F: Pomacanthidae), Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106596, (106596), (2019).
- Carmen Galán-Acedo, Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez, Ellen Andresen, Ricard Arasa-Gisbert, Ecological traits of the world’s primates, Scientific Data, 10.1038/s41597-019-0059-9, 6, 1, (2019).
- Bader H Alhajeri, Lucas M V Porto, Renan Maestri, Habitat productivity is a poor predictor of body size in rodents, Current Zoology, 10.1093/cz/zoz037, (2019).
- Victor P. Zwiener, André A. Padial, Márcia C. M. Marques, The mechanisms explaining tree species richness and composition are convergent in a megadiverse hotspot, Biodiversity and Conservation, 10.1007/s10531-019-01910-9, (2019).
- Luiz H Varzinczak, Mauricio O Moura, Fernando C Passos, Shifts to multiple optima underlie climatic niche evolution in New World phyllostomid bats, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 10.1093/biolinnean/blz123, (2019).
- Jorge Soberón, A Grinnellian niche perspective on species-area relationships, The American Naturalist, 10.1086/705898, (2019).
- Rafael Costa Bastos, Leandro Schlemmer Brasil, Fernando Geraldo Carvalho, Lenize Batista Calvão, José Orlando de Almeida Silva, Leandro Juen, Odonata of the state of Maranhão, Brazil: Wallacean shortfall and priority areas for faunistic inventories, Biota Neotropica, 10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2019-0734, 19, 4, (2019).
- Renan Maestri, Nathan S. Upham, Bruce D. Patterson, Tracing the diversification history of a Neogene rodent invasion into South America, Ecography, 10.1111/ecog.04102, 42, 4, (683-695), (2018).
- Robert Poulin, Fátima Jorge, The geography of parasite discovery across taxa and over time, Parasitology, 10.1017/S003118201800118X, 146, 2, (168-175), (2018).
- Sangay Dorji, Rajanathan Rajaratnam, Lorena Falconi, Stephen E. Williams, Priyakant Sinha, Karl Vernes, Identifying conservation priorities for threatened Eastern Himalayan mammals, Conservation Biology, 10.1111/cobi.13115, 32, 5, (1162-1173), (2018).
- Javier Nori, Fabricio Villalobos, Rafael Loyola, Global priority areas for amphibian research, Journal of Biogeography, 10.1111/jbi.13435, 45, 11, (2588-2594), (2018).
- A. M. Chira, C. R. Cooney, J. A. Bright, E. J. R. Capp, E. C. Hughes, C. J. A. Moody, L. O. Nouri, Z. K. Varley, G. H. Thomas, Correlates of rate heterogeneity in avian ecomorphological traits, Ecology Letters, 10.1111/ele.13131, 21, 10, (1505-1514), (2018).
- Vicente García‐Navas, Marta Rodríguez‐Rey, Petter Z. Marki, Les Christidis, Environmental determinism, and not interspecific competition, drives morphological variability in Australasian warblers (Acanthizidae), Ecology and Evolution, 10.1002/ece3.3925, 8, 8, (3871-3882), (2018).
- Fátima Jorge, Robert Poulin, Poor geographical match between the distributions of host diversity and parasite discovery effort, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 10.1098/rspb.2018.0072, 285, 1879, (20180072), (2018).
- Guy Ziv, Christopher Hassall, Bartosz Bartkowski, Anna F. Cord, Andrea Kaim, Michelle Kalamandeen, Patricia Landaverde-González, Joana L.B. Melo, Ralf Seppelt, Caitriona Shannon, Tomáš Václavík, Brenda Maria Zoderer, Michael Beckmann, A bird’s eye view over ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites across Europe, Ecosystem Services, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.011, 30, (287-298), (2018).
- Urs Kalbitzer, Colin A. Chapman, Primate Responses to Changing Environments in the Anthropocene, Primate Life Histories, Sex Roles, and Adaptability, 10.1007/978-3-319-98285-4_14, (283-310), (2018).
- Matthew J. Grainger, Peter J. Garson, Stephen J. Browne, Philip J.K. McGowan, Tommaso Savini, Conservation status of Phasianidae in Southeast Asia, Biological Conservation, 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.02.005, 220, (60-66), (2018).
- Davi Mello Cunha Crescente Alves, José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho, Kelly da Silva e Souza, Sidney Feitosa Gouveia, Fabricio Villalobos, Geographic variation in the relationship between large-scale environmental determinants and bat species richness, Basic and Applied Ecology, 10.1016/j.baae.2017.12.002, 27, (1-8), (2018).
- Pranav S. Pandit, Megan M. Doyle, Katrina M. Smart, Cristin C. W. Young, Gaylen W. Drape, Christine K. Johnson, Predicting wildlife reservoirs and global vulnerability to zoonotic Flaviviruses, Nature Communications, 10.1038/s41467-018-07896-2, 9, 1, (2018).
- Patrick H. Kavanagh, Bruno Vilela, Hannah J. Haynie, Ty Tuff, Matheus Lima-Ribeiro, Russell D. Gray, Carlos A. Botero, Michael C. Gavin, Hindcasting global population densities reveals forces enabling the origin of agriculture, Nature Human Behaviour, 10.1038/s41562-018-0358-8, 2, 7, (478-484), (2018).
- Jesús N. Pinto-Ledezma, Daniel J. Larkin, Jeannine Cavender-Bares, Patterns of Beta Diversity of Vascular Plants and Their Correspondence With Biome Boundaries Across North America, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10.3389/fevo.2018.00194, 6, (2018).
- Josep Padullés Cubino, Jeannine Cavender-Bares, Sarah E. Hobbie, Diane E. Pataki, Meghan L. Avolio, Lindsay E. Darling, Kelli L. Larson, Sharon J. Hall, Peter M. Groffman, Tara L. E. Trammell, Meredith K. Steele, J. Morgan Grove, Christopher Neill, Drivers of plant species richness and phylogenetic composition in urban yards at the continental scale, Landscape Ecology, 10.1007/s10980-018-0744-7, (2018).
- Bruno R. Ribeiro, Lilian P. Sales, Rafael Loyola, Strategies for mammal conservation under climate change in the Amazon, Biodiversity and Conservation, 10.1007/s10531-018-1518-x, (2018).
- Carolina Trochine, Sandra Brucet, Christine Argillier, Ignasi Arranz, Meryem Beklioglu, Lluís Benejam, Teresa Ferreira, Trygve Hesthagen, Kerstin Holmgren, Erik Jeppesen, Fiona Kelly, Teet Krause, Martti Rask, Pietro Volta, Ian J. Winfield, Thomas Mehner, Non-native Fish Occurrence and Biomass in 1943 Western Palearctic Lakes and Reservoirs and their Abiotic and Biotic Correlates, Ecosystems, 10.1007/s10021-017-0156-6, 21, 3, (395-409), (2017).
- David B. Stern, Jesse Breinholt, Carlos Pedraza‐Lara, Marilú López‐Mejía, Christopher L. Owen, Heather Bracken‐Grissom, James W. Fetzner, Keith A. Crandall, Phylogenetic evidence from freshwater crayfishes that cave adaptation is not an evolutionary dead‐end, Evolution, 10.1111/evo.13326, 71, 10, (2522-2532), (2017).
- Paola Laiolo, Phenotypic similarity in sympatric crow species: Evidence of social convergence?, Evolution, 10.1111/evo.13195, 71, 4, (1051-1060), (2017).
- Renata Alves Mata, Rosana Tidon, Guilherme Oliveira, Bruno Vilela, José Alexandre Felizola Diniz‐Filho, Thiago Fernando Rangel, Levi Carina Terribile, Stacked species distribution and macroecological models provide incongruent predictions of species richness for Drosophilidae in the Brazilian savanna, Insect Conservation and Diversity, 10.1111/icad.12240, 10, 5, (415-424), (2017).
- Pilar Rodríguez, Fabricio Villalobos, Alejandro Sánchez-Barradas, María Eugenia Correa-Cano, La macroecología en México: historia, avances y perspectivas, Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 10.1016/j.rmb.2017.10.006, 88, (52-64), (2017).
- Dieter Lukas, Tim Clutton-Brock, Climate and the distribution of cooperative breeding in mammals, Royal Society Open Science, 10.1098/rsos.160897, 4, 1, (160897), (2017).
- Lilian Patrícia Sales, Olívia Viana Neves, Paulo De Marco, Rafael Loyola, Model uncertainties do not affect observed patterns of species richness in the Amazon, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0183785, 12, 10, (e0183785), (2017).
- Michael Griesser, Szymon M. Drobniak, Shinichi Nakagawa, Carlos A. Botero, Family living sets the stage for cooperative breeding and ecological resilience in birds, PLOS Biology, 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000483, 15, 6, (e2000483), (2017).
- Mariana A. Grossi, David Draper, María José Apodaca, Maira S. Vitali, Luciano Pataro, Liliana Katinas, Juan Carlos Moreno Saiz, The road to 2020 targets and the learnings from the emblematic South American plant genus Nassauvia (Asteraceae), Biodiversity and Conservation, 10.1007/s10531-016-1245-0, 26, 2, (329-351), (2016).
- Roberto Salguero‐Gómez, Owen R. Jones, C. Ruth Archer, Christoph Bein, Hendrik Buhr, Claudia Farack, Fränce Gottschalk, Alexander Hartmann, Anne Henning, Gabriel Hoppe, Gesa Römer, Tara Ruoff, Veronika Sommer, Julia Wille, Jakob Voigt, Stefan Zeh, Dirk Vieregg, Yvonne M. Buckley, Judy Che‐Castaldo, David Hodgson, Alexander Scheuerlein, Hal Caswell, James W. Vaupel, COMADRE: a global data base of animal demography, Journal of Animal Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2656.12482, 85, 2, (371-384), (2016).
- Lauren B. Buckley, Raymond B. Huey, Temperature extremes: geographic patterns, recent changes, and implications for organismal vulnerabilities, Global Change Biology, 10.1111/gcb.13313, 22, 12, (3829-3842), (2016).
- Bruno R. Ribeiro, Lilian P. Sales, Paulo De Marco, Rafael Loyola, Assessing Mammal Exposure to Climate Change in the Brazilian Amazon, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0165073, 11, 11, (e0165073), (2016).
- Luiz H. Varzinczak, Mauricio O. Moura, Fernando C. Passos, Strong but opposing effects of climatic niche breadth and dispersal ability shape bat geographical range sizes across phylogenetic scales, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10.1111/geb.13163, 0, 0, (undefined).
- Yaiyr Astudillo‐Scalia, Fábio Suzart Albuquerque, The geography of high‐priority conservation areas for marine mammals, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10.1111/geb.13175, 0, 0, (undefined).
- L. H. Varzinczak, Understanding the relationship between climatic niches and dispersal through the lens of bat wing morphology, Journal of Zoology, 10.1111/jzo.12826, 0, 0, (undefined).




